The Civil Rules Advisory Committee Wants to Know What You Think

The Civil Rules Advisory Committee released their proposed amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in August. The Committee is seeking comment on their proposals through February 15, 2014, and we have summarized these potential changes below.

Early Court Intervention

The Committee has found that early court intervention has substantially increased cooperation, which in [...]

Enjoy and Share:

Advisory Committee Considers Amendments to FRCP

The Advisory Committee on Civil Rules met late this March in Ann Arbor to discuss amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Included on the agenda was the report of the Discovery Subcommittee, which has been pondering the issue of sanctions and preservation since their mini-conference in September 2011. Since that time, the subcommittee [...]

Enjoy and Share:

How to Look Like a Rube in Three Easy Steps

Josh Gilliland and his always-entertaining “Bow Tie Law’s Blog” turn this week to the case of In re NetBank, Inc., 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 69031 (N.D. Ga. Aug. 7, 2009), in which the producing party went to great lengths to prove to opposing counsel and the court that they knew absolutely NOTHING about e-Discovery.

The [...]

Enjoy and Share:

Clowns To The Left Of Me, Partners To The Right

Wendy Akbar of Quarles & Brady blogs about how e-discovery practice is turning the traditional partner-associate dynamic on its ear. The wizened (and aged) partners end up being rank newbies where e-discovery is concerned, while the baby associates tend to have a much greater grasp of the technology behind the ESI. (The analogy of associates [...]

Enjoy and Share:

Why ALL Search Methods Stink

Yep, my headline for this post is pretty strongly-worded … but it’s also pretty accurate. The fact is, sanction-happy judges and vague, utopian court rules regarding ESI searches don’t mix, when you’re dealing with mounds of mostly-random electronic data.

Don’t take my word for it. Eric P. Mandel writes to the EDD Update blog about [...]

Enjoy and Share:

DE Chancery: Their Spoliation May Be Your Fault

From the National Law Journal, Sheri Qualters reports on the Delaware Court of Chancery’s recent spate of decisions regarding several aspects of e-discovery practice. Most significant to me is Beard Research Inc. v. Kates, in which plaintiffs were granted an adverse inference instruction for missing computer evidence. The key language:

If the parties do not [...]

Enjoy and Share:
©2012, LLM, Inc.
115 East Fifth Street, Suite 200 | Austin, Texas 78701 | Toll free - 877-820-8308 | Local/International - 210-820-0137 | Fax - 210-820-8391 | Contact Us >