Reston, VA and Austin, TX – Content Analyst Company, a leading provider of document analytics to the legal community, and Liquid Litigation Management, a provider of state-of-the-art web-based applications that maximize customers’ litigation proficiency, announced a partnership that incorporates CAAT Advanced Document Analytics into LLM’s
You may remember when Harley-Davidson famously tried for years to trademark the sound of their V-twin motorcycle engine. The process was held up in legal limbo for so long that they ended up walking away and withdrew their request from the United States Patent and
Last fall, we blogged that the inter partes review was celebrating its fifth anniversary and would soon be under scrutiny when the Supreme Court heard Oil States Energy Services v. Greene’s Energy Group. This month, the Court upheld the process, ruling that it doesn’t violate
By May 25, 2018, companies doing business in the EU will have to comply with the updated privacy framework, General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), or face pricey fines. Facebook is preparing for the change through its recently published “privacy principles,” which are intended to show
We kicked off 2018 with a post on the Eastern District of Texas’ amended rules. In that post, we revisited TC Heartland and its potential impact in the new year. We continue the ongoing conversation by briefly looking back at a noteworthy TC Heartland amicus
Counsel has heard it before, but it’s absolutely worth repeating it again: The cost of a data breach to a firm is high, and it can include the loss of clients’ trust. A recent Inside Indiana Business report on “How Legal Technology Helps Firms Protect
Facebook, Google, Apple and other large companies host a significant amount of their data outside the United States. Should the Department of Justice’s warrants under the Stored Communications Act extend beyond domestic borders? The DOJ has asked the Supreme Court to consider the matter this
If you host a podcast, or listen to one, fear not: The patent for podcasting is no more. Per an Ars Technica report, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld an April 2015 inter partes review (IPR) ruling. Under this process, anyone
While some patent trolls’ business may be affected by the Supreme Court’s past decision that patent infringement cases must be filed where the defendant is incorporated and the future one that involves the review of a lower court’s ruling that upheld the U.S. Patent and
Last month, we posted about the potential demise of the Eastern District of Texas after the Supreme Court ruled that patent infringement cases must be filed where the defendant is incorporated. Now, SCOTUS will again consider a patent matter. Per the U.S. News & World
What began as a fight over water flavoring pouches has resulted in the highest court in the land ruling unanimously this week that patent infringement cases must be filed where the defendant is incorporated — “a decision that upends 27 years of law governing patent